The Ball – Arouka responds to Chamber: “Narcissistic, pedantic and authoritarian angle” (Arouka)

“Football Club de Aroca, SDUQ LDA was conscious of the content material of the assertion made immediately by the municipality of Aroca with shock and anger.” Arauca’s prolonged assertion in response to this Wednesday’s debate begins with 22 factors (see associated information).

It is recalled that the Municipality of Aroca issued an announcement that it was “pressured to name the GNR on the Municipal Stadium”, which is its property, “to lower the padlock that restricts entry to the municipal infrastructure parking”, the parking which will likely be used as a parking zone for the Feira das Colheitas.

According to town council, these answerable for Aroka had already “threatened” to lock the gates of the stadium, stopping entry, if the municipality didn’t do some needed work, and this menace was carried out. A scenario worthy of “sturdy rejection” by the City Council, which gives clarification on the stadium’s lease settlement within the remaining a part of the identical assertion.

Now Arauca says town council’s communication “willfully distorts the information recorded therein as a result of it impugns and impugns the competence and considering of the leaders of FC Arauca”.

“We are in opposition to our will, obliged to seem earlier than the general public to make clear the reality of the information”, may be learn within the observe, which recollects that “though the possession of the stadium belongs to the municipality, it isn’t in full possession. The rights of the proprietor, being burdened with the fitting of use of the membership».

Arauca additionally accuses the municipality of a “lack of communication”, making a chronology of occasions and explaining the explanations for it, and additionally questions the calls for for works talked about within the metropolis council’s communication.

And the final a part of the assertion is especially harsh: “We reiterate our outrage on the narcissistic, pundit and authoritarian angle of the municipality.”

Aroka’s assertion

Futebol Clube de Arouca, SDUQ Lda turned conscious of the content material of the assertion made immediately by the municipality of Arouca, as a result of it voluntarily distorts the information recorded there as a result of it makes objectionable issues and accusations of benefit. And the ideas of FC Arouca leaders.

Thus, in opposition to our will, we’re obliged to seem earlier than the general public to clarify the reality of the matter.

1 – The events – FC AROUCA SDUQ Lda and the municipality of Arouca – signed an settlement for the fitting to use the municipal stadium and its integral components that embrace the parking space.

2 – In return, we pay a rental quantity for that use.

3- This Agreement is in power and our obligations are all up to date.

4 – Thus, the municipality granted using the municipal stadium to the Futebol Clube de Arouca and, opposite to what was acknowledged within the failed communication, though the municipality owns it, it isn’t in absolute possession. The rights are the identical as the fitting of use of the membership (FCA, SUDQ Lda.).

5- This doesn’t forestall the municipality from utilizing it for cultural, leisure and sports activities occasions, below the phrases and circumstances outlined within the lease settlement.

6 – A municipality can’t impose its use with out no less than communication or session with its “tenants”, as a result of we’re in a democratic state the place all rights, freedoms and ensures have to be revered.

7 – The municipality restricted itself to informing FC Arouca, that it might set up a live performance within the premises of the stadium, with out guaranteeing the supervision and safety of the premises, and with out permitting entry to the loos and different services.

8 – Aroka promptly and in good religion knowledgeable the municipality that the switch of the venue wouldn’t be doable due to causes associated to safety and the planning of coaching and preparation video games contemplating our participation in a contest of an expert nature. of the Portuguese League.

9 – We have been stunned that there was no communication from the municipality about altering the placement of the occasion, however we have been all the time positive that frequent sense would prevail.

10 – However, on the eve of the sport between FC Arouca and Vitória de Guimarães, and with none prior warning, an organization went to the stadium to arrange a live performance stage and the membership instantly confirmed its concern with safety points. , which means that followers visiting his set up and reception throughout video games could also be in danger.

11 – Fortunately, the corporate in query acknowledged the validity of our considerations and refused to set the stage on the eve of a excessive-threat recreation.

12 – Once once more, we reiterate to the municipality that using the stadium for concert events will intervene with the traditional coaching and planning of the skilled soccer crew, particularly since preparation video games are scheduled of their stadium.

13 – After fixed insistence, we managed a gathering with some representatives of the municipality, nonetheless, regretting that our Excellency the President was not current, as a result of certainly, if he had considered our soccer membership and its leaders, this example would certainly have occurred. did not occur

14 – In that assembly, we defined unequivocally and clearly, all the time in good religion, the the explanation why we weren’t allowed to maintain the occasion within the stadium.

15 – Convinced that the municipality has acknowledged the inconvenience and detrimental results of the occasion to the work and planning of the membership.

16 – Later, we turned conscious of a change within the live performance venue, which renewed our religion in our mayor’s frequent sense.

17 – It so occurs that we’re as soon as once more stunned by the dictatorship imposed by the municipality on the aim of utilizing the stadium’s automobile park, ignoring the considerations and wants already expressed by the membership, and disregarding the phrases of the switch settlement. Stadium.

18 – It can solely be utilized by the municipality for sporting, cultural or leisure occasions, not suitable with its use as a parking lot, additionally ignoring the disturbances and conflicts attributable to this use in already deliberate coaching and video games. .

19 – We have our mayors nearly as good folks, who observe the regulation and the obligations assumed within the contracts, and we now have all the time defended the necessity for the residing forces of the area to work collectively to reward our noble village and area.

20 – Therefore, we now have tried many instances to get the help of the municipality within the needed investments and enhancements within the municipal stadium (imposed by Liga Portugal, IPDJ and UEFA), all the time with a unfavourable response.

21 – In the final two years, the membership ended up finishing up funds works of greater than €100,000.00 by itself, below the phrases of the project contract, below the patronage of the municipality.

22 – Now, the stadium project settlement creates obligations for each events and the municipality, being certain to adjust to it, can’t impose or get rid of the stadium because it sees match, forgetting that it has no obligation to get rid of the stadium, being “leased”…

As for ideas concerning the appropriateness and respect for the angle of the leaders of the Futebol Clube de Arouca, we perceive that such unreasonable, unreasonable feedback and opposite to the opinion of nearly all of Arouqueans, say extra about who makes them. than who they’re. full

In reality, FC Arouca is immediately a nationally and internationally famend membership for its distinctive strategy to skilled soccer competitions, which has introduced rather a lot to its city, primarily due to its leaders and cautious administration with restricted assets. which has no help from the municipality.

Being good folks, respecting and abiding by the regulation, not being any miscreants of the municipal or public treasury.

In view of the above, we reiterate our indignation on the narcissistic, pundit and authoritarian angle of the municipality, which culminated on this dialog to which we’re obliged to reply, as just a little democratic spirit and frequent sense would have sufficed for the entire thing. Situations to keep away from.

Finally, we want to take this chance to want all Aroquans benefit from the Harvest Fair to the most effective of their capability.

Leaders ‘say’

.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.