Aroka responded to the municipality and gave signs to the “so-called ‘leaders'”.

Aroka reacted “angrily” to the municipality’s allegation about the use of the stadium

Aroca defended itself in opposition to accusations made by the metropolis council, which blamed Pratica for stopping the use of the stadium’s car parking zone for the Feira das Colhetas.

The membership held that the municipality couldn’t impose the “use of the stadium” with out “minimal communication or session” with its “tenants” and that the municipality’s preliminary goal was “to maintain a live performance”, “with out making certain supervision and in the hooked up safety and bogs and different services”. Permission to entry”.

“Aruca, in good religion and in good time, knowledgeable that the switch of the website won’t be potential for causes of safety and for the planning of coaching and preparation of video games to take part in the I Liga. Because the use of the stadium just isn’t suitable with the use as a municipal automobile park for sports activities, cultural or leisure occasions solely” , the notice reads.

The membership claimed that it had tried to get the metropolis council’s help for the obligatory funding for the stadium, imposed by the Portuguese Professional Football League, the Portuguese Institute of Sports and Youth (IPJD) and UEFA, “at all times met with a unfavorable response”.

“Since the finish of the membership, in the final two years, the municipality may have to perform price range works of greater than 100,000 euros, protected by the phrases of the task settlement. The stadium task settlement creates obligations for each events and municipalities. It is compulsory to adjust to it, impose it and get rid of it as it’s handy. “Can’t, overlook that they don’t have any proper to get rid of the stadium as it’s on lease,” he defined.

Around midday, the municipality defined that “GNR was compelled to name the municipal stadium to reduce the padlocks stopping entry to the automobile park, which is its property and has full authority.” The administrators “applied the menace” if “the municipality didn’t full the set of duties claimed by the membership”.

“The Aroca leaders, who had been informed by the municipality on August 10 about the intention to use the stadium inside the scope of the Fera das Colhetas (automobile park and precinct), confirmed themselves to be unavailable to adjust to the guidelines said in the contract.”, he says. Statement of Municipality.

Additionally, the Aroca City Council said that in the lease settlement for the stadium, the membership is “obliged to help the group of occasions organized by the municipality” and “has the proper as the proprietor of the tools” to use it, arguing that “so long as the use doesn’t battle with the membership’s commitments concerning sporting occasions”. Because there are not any video games in the skilled league this weekend due to the stoppage for the nationwide groups.


Futebol Clube de Arouca, SDUQ Lda grew to become conscious of the content material of the assertion made at this time by the municipality of Arouca, as a result of it voluntarily distorts the details recorded there as a result of it makes objectionable issues and accusations of advantage. And the ideas of FC Aroka leaders.

Thus, in opposition to our will, we’re obliged to seem earlier than the public to clarify the reality of the matter.

1 – The events – FC AROUCA SDUQ Lda and the municipality of Arouca – signed an settlement for the proper to use the municipal stadium and its integral components that embody the parking space.

2 – In return, we pay a rental quantity for that use.

3- This Agreement is in power and our obligations are all up to date.

4 – Thus, the municipality granted the use of the municipal stadium to the Futebol Clube de Arouca and, opposite to what was said in the failed communication, regardless of the possession of the municipality, it isn’t in full possession of the proprietor’s rights, being encumbered. With proper of use of Club (FCA, SUDQ Lda.).

5- This doesn’t forestall the municipality from utilizing it for cultural, leisure and sports activities occasions, below the phrases and situations outlined in the lease settlement.

6 – A municipality can not impose its use with out no less than speaking or consulting with its “tenants”, as a result of we’re in a democratic state the place all rights, freedoms and ensures have to be revered.

7 – The municipality restricted itself to informing FC Arouca, that they might arrange a live performance in the stadium premises, with out making certain the supervision and safety of the premises, and with out permitting entry to the bogs and different services.

8 – Aroka promptly and in good religion knowledgeable the municipality that the switch of the venue wouldn’t be potential due to causes associated to safety and the planning of coaching and preparation video games contemplating our participation in a contest of knowledgeable nature. Portuguese League.

9 – We had been shocked that there was no communication from the municipality about altering the location of the occasion, however at all times positive that frequent sense will prevail.

10 – However, on the eve of the sport between FC Arouca and Vitória de Guimarães, and with none prior warning, an organization went to the stadium to arrange a live performance stage and the membership instantly confirmed its concern with safety points. , which means that followers visiting his set up and reception throughout video games could also be in danger.

11 – Fortunately, the firm in query acknowledged the validity of our issues and refused to set the stage on the eve of a high-risk sport.

12 – Once once more, we reiterate to the municipality that the use of the stadium for live shows will intervene with the regular coaching and planning of the skilled soccer staff, particularly since preparation video games are scheduled of their stadium.

13 – After persistent insistence, we managed to have a gathering with some representatives of the municipality, nonetheless, regretting that our Excellency the President was not current, as a result of, in fact, he has considered our soccer membership and its leaders, that is the scenario. It definitely would not have occurred.

14 – In that assembly, we clearly and clearly defined, at all times in good religion, the the explanation why we weren’t allowed to maintain the occasion at the stadium.

15 – Convinced that the municipality acknowledged the inconvenience and detrimental impact of the occasion to the work and planning of the membership.

16 – Later, we grew to become conscious of a change in the live performance venue, which renewed our religion in our mayor’s frequent sense.

17 – It occurs that we’re as soon as once more shocked by the dictatorship imposed by the municipality concerning the use of the parking house of the stadium, ignoring the issues and wants already expressed by the membership and the phrases of the switch settlement. Stadium.

18 – It can solely be utilized by the municipality for the realization of sports activities, cultural or leisure occasions, not suitable with the use as a carpark, in addition to the disturbance and battle brought on by the already deliberate coaching and video games due to this use. .

19 – We have our mayors who’re good individuals, who obey the legislation and the obligations assumed in the contract, and we have now at all times asserted the want for the dwelling forces of the area to work collectively to reward our village and area.

20 – Therefore, we have now tried a number of occasions to get the help of the municipality in the obligatory investments and enhancements in the municipal stadium (imposed by Liga Portugal, IPDJ and UEFA), at all times with a unfavorable response.

21 – In the final two years, the membership ended up finishing up price range works of greater than €100,000.00 by itself, below the phrases of the task contract, below the patronage of the municipality.

22 – Now, the stadium task settlement creates obligations for each events and the municipality, being sure to adjust to it, can not impose or get rid of the stadium because it sees match, forgetting that it has no obligation to get rid of the stadium, being “leased”…

As for ideas about the appropriateness and respect for the perspective of the leaders of the Futebol Clube de Arouca, we perceive that such unreasonable, unreasonable feedback and opposite to the opinion of the majority of Arouqueans, say extra about who makes them. than who they’re. full

In reality, FC Arouca is at this time a nationally and internationally famend membership for its distinctive method to skilled soccer competitions, which has introduced loads to its city, primarily due to its leaders and cautious administration with restricted assets. which has no help from the municipality.

Being good individuals, respecting and abiding by the legislation, not being any miscreants of the municipal or public treasury.

In view of the above, we reiterate our indignation at the narcissistic, pundit and authoritarian perspective of the municipality, which culminated in the dialog to which we’re obliged to reply, as somewhat democratic sense and frequent sense would have sufficed to keep away from this. The complete scenario.

Finally, we want to take this chance to want all Aroquans take pleasure in the Harvest Fair to the better of their skill.

so known as “leaders”


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.